Artificial Intelligence and Legal-Institutional Adaptation in India and Nigeria: A Comparative Review of Doctrinal, Administrative and Capacity Constraints
Artificial intelligence (AI) is being absorbed into the legal and administrative institutions of the Global South faster than the doctrinal frameworks governing those institutions are being revised. This review examines that gap comparatively, using India and Nigeria as paired cases. It synthesises eight recent studies published in the British Journal of Contemporary Research alongside the wider governance literature, organising the evidence around four themes: conceptual boundary-setting for legal purposes; AI in adjudication and procedural justice; AI in executive and administrative decision-making; and the infrastructural, labour-market and cybersecurity preconditions on which any regulatory design depends. Three findings emerge. First, both jurisdictions have converged on principle-based, non-statutory governance instruments India's AI Governance Guidelines and Nigeria's National AI Strategy that articulate transparency and accountability commitments without creating enforceable individual remedies. Second, the binding constraint in both cases is institutional rather than doctrinal: uneven digitisation, fragmented data, thin technical audit capacity and low digital literacy limit what any legal standard can practically achieve. Third, the two states are diverging in emphasis, with Indian scholarship concentrating on constitutional and procedural review of algorithmic power and Nigerian scholarship concentrating on infrastructure security and labour transition. The review argues that rights-based safeguards and capacity-building are complementary rather than sequential, and identifies the absence of empirical evidence on deployed public-sector systems in both jurisdictions as the most consequential research gap.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Governance, Algorithmic Accountability, Procedural Justice, Administrative Law, India, Nigeria, Global South Regulation
How to Cite
APA
SS, K. K. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and Legal-Institutional Adaptation in India and Nigeria: A Comparative Review of Doctrinal, Administrative and Capacity Constraints. Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22683984
MLA
SS, Karthik Kumar. "Artificial Intelligence and Legal-Institutional Adaptation in India and Nigeria: A Comparative Review of Doctrinal, Administrative and Capacity Constraints." Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies, vol. 1, no. 7, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22683984
Chicago
SS, Karthik Kumar. "Artificial Intelligence and Legal-Institutional Adaptation in India and Nigeria: A Comparative Review of Doctrinal, Administrative and Capacity Constraints." Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies 1, no. 7 (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22683984
References
Awurum, J. A. (2026). Safe harbor rules in the decoupling era: A comparative analysis of ISP liability under the EU Digital Services Act and the 2026 PRC Cybersecurity Law amendments. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 011. https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-BMDP8RQ4
Council of Europe. (2024). Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225). Council of Europe.
Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act, 2015 (as amended 2024) (Nigeria).
Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, No. 22 of 2023 (India).
Federal Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy. (2024). National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Draft). National Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics & National Information Technology Development Agency.
Garg, R., & Patel, J. (2026). A study of awareness and use of artificial intelligence in context of academic skill development among undergraduate students. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 012. https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-8AN5RUSC
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1 (Supreme Court of India).
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. (2025). India AI Governance Guidelines. IndiaAI Mission, Government of India.
Munshi, N., & Kanse, N. (2026). Synthetic intelligence vs. artificial intelligence: Conceptual, legal, and ethical divergences. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 003. https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-PN8Z96MI
National Digital Economy and E-Governance Act, 2024 (Nigeria).
Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 (Nigeria).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449). OECD Publishing.
Orji, C. E., Durunna, L. I., Ononiwu, C. C., & Ukachukwu, T. N. (2026). Democratizing fraud detection: An explainable XGBoost system with DeepSeek-enhanced analytics for real-time credit card transaction monitoring. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 040. https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-P6K6WXGM
Oxford Insights. (2025). Government AI Readiness Index 2024. Oxford Insights.
Rechtbank Den Haag, NJCM c.s. v. State of the Netherlands (SyRI), ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:1878 (5 February 2020).
Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act), OJ L 277/1.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), OJ L, 2024/1689.
Sharma, A. K. (2026). AI and civil procedural justice in India. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 009. https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-FV4VHPK5
Supreme Court of India, E-Committee. (2021). Vision document for Phase III of the eCourts Project. Supreme Court of India.
Ukaeje, O., Uchenna, I., & Oluwatosin, E. K. (2026). Digital transformation and emerging cyber threats: Assessing vulnerabilities in Nigeria's security sector. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 043. https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-UQPMTDPC
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Yadav, P. (2026). Artificial intelligence and human rights: Legal challenges in public decision-making. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 060. https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-S2SEBJER
Yaksat, E. A., & Ukpai, E. (2026). The relationship between participation in lifelong learning models and reskilling of workers displaced by artificial intelligence in Cross River State Nigeria. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 022. https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-6V7YV27S
