Home › BJAR › Vol 1, Issue 4 › Article
Original Research Article

Booking Status, Maternal Education and Gestational Age at Presentation as Correlates of Perinatal Outcome among Women Managed for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Hospital Record Review

Timi Fiekumo Buseri, Osuji Franklin Chukwuemeka, Ruth Ebiegberi Obidake, Buseri, Oyintokoni Beauty, Esther Oduru

Click an author's name to view their details

Timi Fiekumo Buseri Corresponding Author

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bayelsa Medical University

Correspondence: timibuseri@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Late or absent antenatal booking remains a well-documented risk marker for adverse pregnancy outcome in sub-Saharan Africa, yet its interaction with maternal education and gestational age at presentation among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is less frequently quantified at the level of individual hospital cohorts. Objective: To examine associations between educational attainment, antenatal booking status, gestational age at presentation, and perinatal outcome among women managed for preeclampsia/eclampsia. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted on de-identified hospital records of 107 women managed for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; 104 records with complete outcome data were analysed. Associations between categorical variables were tested using Pearson's chi-square test of independence, with Fisher's exact test and Cramér's V reported where expected cell counts were small. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Booking status was strongly associated with educational attainment (χ²(3) = 21.17, p < 0.001, V = 0.45): only 31.2% of women with secondary education were booked compared with 68.8% of those with tertiary education. Gestational age at admission was significantly associated with neonatal birth weight (χ²(9) = 21.57, p = 0.010, V = 0.28) and showed a borderline association with fetal outcome (χ²(3) = 7.49, p = 0.058), with the highest stillbirth proportion (34.0%) occurring among women admitted at 30–39 weeks. Unbooked women had significantly more incomplete perinatal documentation (missing Apgar and birth-weight records) than booked women (p < 0.05 for all three indices). Conclusion: Educational disadvantage and lack of antenatal booking cluster together and are linked to later presentation and less complete perinatal assessment, reinforcing the case for targeted, education-sensitive antenatal outreach in hypertensive pregnancy care.

Keywords: Preeclampsia; Eclampsia; Antenatal Booking; Maternal Education; Gestational Age; Stillbirth; Birth Weight; Low-Resource Setting
📄 Read Full Text Open in new tab ↗

How to Cite

APA

Buseri, T. F., Chukwuemeka, O. F., Obidake, R. E., Buseri, O. B., & Oduru, E. (2026). Booking Status, Maternal Education and Gestational Age at Presentation as Correlates of Perinatal Outcome among Women Managed for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Hospital Record Review. British Journal of Advanced Research, 1(4), Article 015. https://doi.org/10.68263/BJAR-CFUAYT35

MLA

Buseri, Timi Fiekumo, Osuji Franklin Chukwuemeka, Ruth Ebiegberi Obidake, Oyintokoni Beauty Buseri, and Esther Oduru. "Booking Status, Maternal Education and Gestational Age at Presentation as Correlates of Perinatal Outcome among Women Managed for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Hospital Record Review." British Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 1, no. 4, 2026, article 015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.68263/BJAR-CFUAYT35

Chicago

Buseri, Timi Fiekumo, Osuji Franklin Chukwuemeka, Ruth Ebiegberi Obidake, Oyintokoni Beauty Buseri, and Esther Oduru. "Booking Status, Maternal Education and Gestational Age at Presentation as Correlates of Perinatal Outcome among Women Managed for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Hospital Record Review." British Journal of Advanced Research 1, no. 4 (2026): 015. https://doi.org/10.68263/BJAR-CFUAYT35

References

World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations for Prevention and Treatment of Pre-eclampsia and Eclampsia. Geneva: WHO Press; 2011. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2014;2(6):e323–e333. Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003;102(1):181–192. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 222. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020;135(6):e237–e260. Njoku CO, Emechebe CI, Odusolu P, et al. Pregnancy outcome in booked and unbooked mothers in South-Eastern Nigeria. East African Medical Journal (Abia State University Teaching Hospital series), 2010. Iklaki CU, Inaku JU, Ekabua JE, Ekanem EI, Udo AE. Perinatal outcome in unbooked teenage pregnancies in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; Article 246983. Briggs ND. Maternal death in the booked and unbooked patients: University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital experience. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1988;1(1):26–29. Ekwempu CC. The influence of antenatal care on pregnancy outcome. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1988;1(1):67–71. Osungbade KO, Ige OK. Public health perspectives of preeclampsia in developing countries: implication for health system strengthening. Journal of Pregnancy. 2011; Article 481095.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Free to read, share, and adapt with attribution.

Article Access
↓ Download PDF 👁 Read PDF
85
Views
46
Downloads
Metadata
ISSN 3153-709X
Tracking ID BJAR_SEP_26_047
Article No. 015
↓ Download JATS XML
Article Info
Journal BJAR
Volume Vol 1, No 4
Year 2026
Type Original Research Article
Licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Share