<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="original-research-article">

  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCARM</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>JCARM</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">3139-7247</issn>
            <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Ivory and Finch Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5281/zenodo.23280589</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JCARM_SEP_26_180</article-id>

      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>

      <title-group>
        <article-title>Ethical Issues in Government Communication in Rivers State: A Relationship Model among Netizens</article-title>
      </title-group>

      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
                        <surname>George Ogazi Mani (PhD)</surname>
            <given-names>EZE,</given-names>
          </name>
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6765-6123</contrib-id>
                    <aff>Department of Mass Communication, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.</aff>
          <email>george.eze@iaue.edu.ng</email>
        </contrib>
                                          <contrib contrib-type="author">
              <name>
                                <surname>Adindu Obinuchi (PhD)</surname>
                <given-names>WODU,</given-names>
              </name>
                            <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/https:// orcid.org/0009-0004-6446-7555</contrib-id>
                                          <aff>Department of Mass Communication, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Nigeria</aff>
                          </contrib>
                                    </contrib-group>

            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>10</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      
      
            <self-uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23280589"/>
      
      <abstract>
        <p>This study examined the ethical challenges surrounding government communication with netizens, aiming to create a model for building relationships among adults in Rivers State, Nigeria. With the rise of social media, government institutions have shifted from merely broadcasting messages to engaging in a two-way conversation where citizens actively assess what the government communicates. However, this shift brings along issues like transparency, accountability, misinformation, responsiveness, and ethical standards, all of which can undermine public trust and the relationship between the government and its citizens. The research utilised a qualitative approach, gathering data through semi-structured interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with a carefully chosen group of adult social media users, media professionals, academics, civil society members, and community leaders in Rivers State. The analysis was conducted using thematic methods. The results highlighted that ethical communication from the government plays a crucial role in fostering public trust, credibility, citizen engagement, and the overall quality of relationships. Participants pointed out that key ethical principles such as honesty, transparency, accountability, responsiveness, and fairness are vital for effective government communication. On the flip side, practices like selective information sharing, political propaganda, slow responses to citizen inquiries, and poor engagement on social media were seen as detrimental to government-citizen relationships and public confidence. The study also found that social media has become a crucial space for democratic dialogue, urging governments to embrace ethical, participatory, and citizen-focused communication strategies. Based on these insights, the study suggests a relationship-building model grounded in ethical communication, dialogue, transparency, responsiveness, and mutual trust. It concludes that sticking to ethical communication principles is key to nurturing sustainable relationships between the government and its citizens.</p>
      </abstract>

            <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
                <kwd>Government Communication</kwd>
                <kwd>Netizens</kwd>
                <kwd>Relationship Building</kwd>
                <kwd>Social Media</kwd>
                <kwd>Rivers State</kwd>
              </kwd-group>
      
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
                <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>05</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
              </history>

      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright &copy; 2026 by the authors</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>

    </article-meta>
  </front>

    <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
                      <ref id="ref-1">
          <mixed-citation>Bowen, S. A. (2013). Using classic social media cases to distil ethical guidelines for digital engagement. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(2), 119–133.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-2">
          <mixed-citation>Braun, V., &amp;amp; Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-3">
          <mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., &amp;amp; Lee, C. (2025). Ethics in government communication on social media: Testing a relationship-building model among young adults in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Communication, 35(2), 157–176.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-4">
          <mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., &amp;amp; Sun, W. (2023). Timeliness, responsiveness and the human voice: The effects of dialogic strategies and the mediating role of perceived communication ethicality on social media relationship building. Public Relations Review, 49(3), 102324.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-5">
          <mixed-citation>Creswell, J. W., &amp;amp; Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-6">
          <mixed-citation>Dong, C., &amp;amp; Morehouse, J. (2022). Toward a caring government: Advancing ethical government public relations with a care-based relationship cultivation model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 34(5–6), 286–306.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-7">
          <mixed-citation>Eller, W. S. (2016). Expanding public sector communications: Moving beyond public affairs to facilitate collaborative public relations. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(4), 358–365.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-8">
          <mixed-citation>Grunig, J. E., &amp;amp; Huang, Y. H. (2000). From organisational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies and relationship outcomes. In J. A. Ledingham &amp;amp; S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public Relations as Relationship Management (pp. 23–53). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-9">
          <mixed-citation>Guo, L., Zhang, Y., &amp;amp; Wu, Y. (2018). Examining the determinants and outcomes of netizens&#039; participation behaviours on government social media profiles during social crises. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(4), 440–461.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-10">
          <mixed-citation>Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Polity Press.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-11">
          <mixed-citation>Hon, L. C., &amp;amp; Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations. Institute for Public Relations.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-12">
          <mixed-citation>Hood, C. (2010). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-13">
          <mixed-citation>Kent, M. L., &amp;amp; Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-14">
          <mixed-citation>Kent, M. L., &amp;amp; Taylor, M. (2016). From Homo Economicus to Homo Dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 60–67.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-15">
          <mixed-citation>Ledingham, J. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 181–198.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-16">
          <mixed-citation>Ledingham, J. A., &amp;amp; Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organisation–public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55–65.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-17">
          <mixed-citation>Lincoln, Y. S., &amp;amp; Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-18">
          <mixed-citation>Macnamara, J. (2016). Organisational Listening: The Missing Essential in Public Communication. Peter Lang.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-19">
          <mixed-citation>Mergel, I. (2013). Social Media in the Public Sector: A Guide to Participation, Collaboration and Transparency. Jossey-Bass.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                  </ref-list>
  </back>
  
</article>
