JCARM Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies JCARM 3139-7247 Ivory and Finch Publishers 10.5281/zenodo.21278137 JCARM_JUN_26_166 Original Research Article Public Participation in Road Infrastructure Provision in Abeokuta, Nigeria Peter Oluwasola Olajide Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State. olajideoluwasola3@gmail.com J. KEHINDE Olamiju Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State. 10 07 2026 1 5

Road infrastructure is a key determinant of urban mobility, communication, economic performance and spatial organisation in any nation. Its provision statutorily as government’s responsibility has been challenged by economic recession, multiple responsibilities and technical breaches. To this end, the public have had to intervene in providing couple of interventions to meeting their needs. This study therefore, seeks to evaluate public participation in road infrastructure provision in Abeokuta, Nigeria with a view to suggest strategies to improve the economy and spatial organisation of the city. Information was elicited from 375 systematically selected stakeholders (CDA members, traditional leaders, government officials and key informants) who had direct involvement across road project phases. Observed data were subjected to descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages and cross-tabulations, while Spearman Rank Correlation analysis was used to examine relationships among the study variables. Findings reveal that majority of the stakeholders were youths (47.2%). Others were older men (23.5%), women (22.1%) and government officials (0.8%) who are engaged in planning and design (66.1%), construction activities (65.3%), site selection (63.2%), needs identification (62.7%) and monitoring and evaluation (45.3%). The contribution of the stakeholders in road provision has been through finances (levies and fund raising) (34.9%), voluntary labour (skilled and unskilled) (25.1%), decision-making (20.0%), procurement of materials (14.9%) and oversight functions (5.1%). Major factors hindering the participation of public in road projects are financial constraints (77.6%), lack of trust in governance (72.8%) and political interference (67.5%). Benefits associated with public participation in road provision include: community acceptance of projects (77.6%), enhancement of livelihood sources (62.9%), timely road project delivery (53.1%) and reduced resource conflict (42.4%). The study identifies public participation in road project provision as a panacea to meeting the deficits from government efforts. It recommends the strengthening of participatory planning, capacity building for stakeholders, equitable resource mobilisation and accountability.

 Public Participation Road Infrastructure Community Development Associations Urban Governance Abeokuta Nigeria. 29 06 2026 02 07 2026 Copyright © 2026 by the authors This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. References Adam, A. M. (2020). Sample size determination in survey research. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 26(5), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2020/v26i530263 Adekunle, L. (2021). Participatory governance and community development associations in Nigeria. Ibadan University Press. Adeyemi, T., & Oladipo, A. (2023). Citizen-led road governance in Nigeria: A multi-state comparative analysis. Nigerian Journal of Public Administration and Local Government, 18(2), 210–234. Adusei-Asante, K., & Hancock, P. (2012). When empowerment disempowers: A case study of Ghana's community-based rural development projects. Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 9(2), 43–62. Aina, K., & Omoregie, E. (2024). Community Development Associations and road infrastructure governance in Ogun State. Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 12(1), 44–67. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association. Ban, R., Jha, S., & Rao, V. (2012). Who has voice in a deliberative democracy? Evidence from transcripts of village parliaments in South India. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.05.005 Cabannes, Y. (2015). The impact of participatory budgeting on basic services: Municipal practices and evidence from the field. Environment and Urbanization, 27(1), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815572297 Cabannes, Y., & Lipietz, B. (2018). Revisiting the democratic promise of participatory budgeting in light of competing political, good governance and technocratic logics. Environment and Urbanization, 30(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247817746279 Casey, Katherine. 2018. "Radical Decentralization: Does Community-Driven Development Work?" Annual Review of Economics 10: 139–163. Clarke, J., & Patel, L. (2020). Co-production in urban service delivery: A global review. Urban Governance Quarterly, 7(1), 10–28. Collins, S. (2021). Empowerment and equity in participatory infrastructure planning. Development Studies Review, 39(2), 200–218. Echendu, A. J. (2023). Urban planners' perspectives of public participation in planning in Nigeria. SN Social Sciences, 3, 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00604-4 Fadare, S., Nwokoro, I., Lawanson, T., & Onifade, V. (2013). Emerging issues in urban planning and development. Obafemi Awolowo University Press. Forster, P. I. (2013). Reinstatement of intraspecific taxa for Bosistoa pentacocca (F.Muell.) Baill. (Rutaceae) with a new combination B. pentacocca subsp. connaricarpa (Domin) P.I. Forst. Austrobaileya: A Journal of Plant Systematics. Fox, J. A. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011 Friendly, A. (2019). The contradictions of participatory planning: Reflections on the role of politics in urban development in Niterói, Brazil. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(7), 910–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1569468 Friendly, A., & Stiphany, K. (2019). Paradigm or paradox? The 'cumbersome impasse' of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning. Urban Studies, 56(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018768748 Harris, M. D. (2022). Stakeholder roles in municipal road infrastructure projects: Evidence from the United States. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 203–220. International Association for Public Participation. (2018). IAP2 spectrum of public participation. https://www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf Ijah, A. 2013. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Local Government Financing in Ghana." Public Policy and Administration Research 3 (7): 123–131. International Association for Public Participation. (2020). Spectrum of public participation. IAP2 Federation. Joshi, A. (2013). Context matters: A causal chain approach to unpacking social accountability interventions. World Development, 47, 233–246. Lekettey et al. (2026). Lekettey, E., Andriana, D., Nugraha, N., Purnomo, B. S., & Sari, M. (2026). Fiscal autonomy, intergovernmental transfers and capital expenditure: evidence from Ghana. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies. Lyon, Fergus. (2003). "Community Groups and Livelihoods in Remote Areas of Ghana: How Sustainability Can Be Achieved." Community Development Journal 38 (4): 323–331. Matu, J., Kyalo, D., Mbugua, J., & Mulwa, A. (2020). Stakeholder participation in project planning: Prerequisite to effective completion of urban road transport infrastructure projects in Kenya. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 8(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbcpr.2020.81006 Mensah, K. (2021). Community labor brigades and feeder road maintenance in Ghana. University of Ghana Press. Mhina, J. A., & Magesa, R. J. (2025). Challenges of community participation in road maintenance projects: Evidence from Babati District Council, Tanzania. Journal of Social and Community Development, 2(03), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.56741/jscd.v2i03.1348 Mitchell, D. R. (2021). Citizen participation and infrastructure quality: Longitudinal evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Policy and Practice, 27(2), 130–148. Mwangi, S., & Njeri, K. (2020). Enhancing participation: Gender, diaspora, and digital tools in road governance. International Journal of Urban Studies, 15(3), 102–117. Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., & Divakar, S. (2021). Determination of sample size and sampling methods in applied research. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 3(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.24874/PES03.01.003. Nugroho, A. Y. (2021). Participatory planning reforms in road infrastructure in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 185–202. Olawale, A. (2022). Community Development Associations and informal infrastructure provision in Southwest Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Urban Affairs, 14(1), 88–104. Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X Rojas, C. F. (2020). Ownership and sustainability in community-driven road projects: Lessons from Chile. Journal of South American Development Studies, 14(1), 49–66. Sanyal, P., & Rao, V. (2018). Oral democracy: Deliberation in Indian village assemblies. Cambridge University Press. Sharma, R. K. (2021). Community involvement in rural road infrastructure projects in India. International Journal of Infrastructure Studies, 12(3), 44–59. Sukasuka et al. (2022) directly address the neglect of ex-post evaluation in infrastructure projects. World Bank. (2021). Infrastructure in Sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative perspective. World Bank Publications.