JCARM Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies JCARM 3139-7247 Ivory and Finch Publishers 10.5281/zenodo.22683967 JCARM_AUG_26_080 Original Research Article US TRADE POLICY UNDER TRUMP AND THE EROSION OF MULTILATERAL TRADE RULES Renner Ikuru (PhD) Ubelejit Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Abuja, Nigeria ubelejit.Ikuru@gmail.com Renner Ikuru Ubelejit Ministry of Foreign Affairs Michael Benjamin Uwoh Nasarawa State University, Keffi 10 09 2026 1 7

This paper examines how the Trump administration (2017–2021 and 2025–present) eroded multilateral trade norms and changed the global economic system. Three interrelated questions are examined through secondary investigation of legal sources, economic science, and policy literature. The study uses main legal sources (WTO agreements, GATT articles, U.S. trade laws, and dispute settlement reports), peer-reviewed academic literature, international organization reports, and contemporaneous news media for qualitative documentary analysis. Liberal institutionalism, hegemonic stability theory, constructivism, global production network (GPN) theory, and legal institutionalism comprise the analytical framework. The findings show a concerted attack on multilateral trade system fundamentals. The Trump administration's paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body, imposition of unilateral "reciprocal tariffs" in April 2025, negotiation of discriminatory bilateral deals, and expansive invocation of national security exceptions directly violate GATT Articles I, II, and XXI, as well as WTO transparency and exclusive jurisdiction provisions. The U.S. blockade of Appellate Body nominations leaves the WTO's dispute settlement system unable to implement its rules. Studies show that the 2018–19 tariffs caused significant welfare losses, regressive distributional impacts that hurt poorer households, and dynamic costs such as policy uncertainty, lower investment, and supply chain disruption. Sectoral dislocation is hidden by neutral employment consequences. The long-term impacts on global industrial networks, including supply chain reorganisation along regional or national lines, are just beginning to be appreciated. The study finds the multilateral trading system in an existential crisis. The study recommendations include U.S. re-engagement with WTO dispute settlement, urgent WTO reform, increased regional initiatives that are multilaterally compatible, and a reinvigorated research agenda on these changes' long-term impacts.

  Multilateral Trade Rules Trump Administration Protectionism Trade Policy International Economic Law 30 08 2026 01 09 2026 Copyright © 2026 by the authors This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. References Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A. M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401-419. Amiti, M., Redding, S. J., & Weinstein, D. E. (2019). The impact of the 2018 tariffs on prices and welfare. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 187-210. Auttor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2019). When work disappears: Manufacturing decline and the falling marriage market value of young men. American Economic Review: Insights, 1(2), 161-178. Blenkinsop, P. (2019, December 9). U.S. trade offensive takes out WTO as global arbiter. Reuters. Blazek, J., & Lypianin, A. (2024). Geopolitical decoupling and the restructuring of Central and Eastern European automotive GPNs. European Urban and Regional Studies, 31(2), 145-163. Carter, C. A., & Steinbach, S. (2020). The impact of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. agriculture. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 42(4), 637-652. Coe, N. M., Dicken, P., & Hess, M. (2008). Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 271-295. Caldara, D., Iacoviello, M., Molligo, P., Prestipino, A., & Raffo, A. (2020). The economic effects of trade policy uncertainty. Journal of Monetary Economics, 109, 38-59. Curran, L. (2025). The future of global production networks post Trump II: Coupling and decoupling in a world of trade policy uncertainty. Journal of Economic Geography, lbaf062. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020). The return to protectionism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 1-55. Fajgelbaum, P. D., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2016). Measuring the unequal gains from trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), 1113-1180. Folsom, R. H. (2025). International trade law including Trump revisited in a nutshell (9th ed.). West Academic. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104. Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press. Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press. Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A. M. (Eds.). (2000). Legalization and world politics [Special issue]. International Organization, 54(3). Gruber, L. (2000). Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of supranational institutions. Princeton University Press. Grant, J., Arita, S., Emlinger, C., Johansson, R., & Xie, C. (2021). Agricultural trade and trade policy: A review of the 2018-2019 trade conflict. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(4), 1287-1312. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review, 84(4), 833-850. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., & Lhuillier, H. (2021). Supply chain resilience: Should policy promote diversification or reshoring? Journal of Public Economics, 203, 104521. Handley, K., & Limão, N. (2017). Policy uncertainty, trade, and welfare: Theory and evidence for China and the United States. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2731-2783. Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton University Press. Jackson, J. H. (1997). The world trading system: Law and policy of international economic relations (2nd ed.). MIT Press. Jones, K. (2026). Transatlantic Trade, the Trump Disruption and the World Trade Organization. In M. Riddervold, G. Rosén, & J. R. Greenberg (Eds.), Populism and the Future of Transatlantic Relations: Challenges and Policy Options. European Center for Populism Studies (ECPS). Jan, F. N., & Phansalkar, M. (2019, December 12). Trump's war on the World Trade Organization. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/ Kanth, D. R. (2025, August 15). Generous offers to resolve unilateral reciprocal tariffs may yield little relief. Third World Network. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press. Keohane, R. O. (1989). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Westview Press. Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., & Slaughter, A. M. (2000). Legalized dispute resolution: Interstate and transnational. International Organization, 54(3), 457-488. Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). *The world in depression, 1929-1939*. University of California Press. Krasner, S. D. (1976). State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics, 28(3), 317-347. Keaten, J., & Wiseman, P. (2019, December 11). World trade without rules? U.S. shuts down WTO appeals court. Detroit Legal News. Associated Press. Lee, Y.-S., & Garcia, F. (2025, November 11). The Supreme Court's tariff test: What is at stake for the rule of law and global trade. The Diplomat. Low, P., & Riddell, G. (2025). Trump's Trade Policy and the World Trade Organization. World Trade Review, 1-17. Mavroidis, P. C. (2025). The WTO is on the wrong side of the bargain in the Trump administration 'deals'. Oxford Academic. Pavlinek, P. (2024). Geopolitical decoupling and the restructuring of global production networks. Economic Geography, 100(1), 1-26. Snidal, D. (1985). The limits of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization, 39(4), 579-614. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. (2025a). US tariff policy and a transformation of global trade architecture. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. (2025b). Protectionism, power, and the erosion of WTO discipline: Legal and economic lessons from the trade wars. Section 301: How USTR polices trade partners. (2026, February 23). The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ Thailand still negotiating U.S. tariff deals as Indonesia, Vietnam sign agreements. (2026, February 20). The Nation Thailand. https://www.nationthailand.com/ United States Trade Representative. (2026, January 23). Ambassador Jamieson Greer outlines how President Trump is reviving America's historic trade playbook to forge a balanced international economic order [Press release]. Vranes, E. (2023). WTO security exceptions in practice and scholarship: Curtailing "trump cards" through proportionality. Springer. Weiler, J. H. H. (2001). The rule of lawyers and the ethos of diplomats: Reflections on the internal and external legitimacy of WTO dispute settlement. Journal of World Trade, 35(2), 191-207. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press. Yeung, H. W. C., & Coe, N. M. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29-58. Zhang, C., & Wang, E. (2026, February 6). WTO dispute settlement mechanism innovation practice and the compliance boundary of pharmaceutical industrial policy: Analysis of the first WTO appellate arbitration case "EU v. Turkey pharmaceutical case." China Court Network / People's Court Daily.