<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="original-research-article">

  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">BJAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>British Journal of Advanced Research</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>BJAR</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">3153-709X</issn>
            <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Ivory and Finch Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.68263/BJAR-3DTZ86PP</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">BJAR_OCT_26_059</article-id>

      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>

      <title-group>
        <article-title>Artificial Intelligence as an Educational Tool in Upper Basic Science Education: Teachers’ Perceptions and Integration Practices in Makurdi, Nigeria</article-title>
      </title-group>

      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
                        <surname>Agbidye</surname>
            <given-names>Anna</given-names>
          </name>
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3194-7291</contrib-id>
                    <aff>Science Education Department, Benue State University (Now Rev. Fr. Moses Orshio Adasu University, Makurdi, Nigeria)</aff>
          <email>annagbidye@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
                                          <contrib contrib-type="author">
              <name>
                                <surname>Sesugh Kpiranyam</surname>
                <given-names>Felix</given-names>
              </name>
                            <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4113-211X</contrib-id>
                                          <aff>Science Education Department, Benue State University (Now Rev. Fr. Moses Orshio Adasu University, Makurdi, Nigeria)</aff>
                          </contrib>
                                    </contrib-group>

            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>10</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      
      
            <self-uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.68263/BJAR-3DTZ86PP"/>
      
      <abstract>
        <p>This study examined Upper Basic Science teachers’ perceptions and integration practices regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in Basic Science teaching in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. A cross-sectional descriptive-correlational survey design was adopted. The population comprised Upper Basic Science teachers in public and private schools in Makurdi, with 47 teachers from 40 selected schools participating. Data were collected using the Artificial Intelligence Perceptions and Integration Practices Questionnaire (AIPI-Q), covering teachers’ perceptions of AI, technologies and purposes of use, and integration practices. The instrument was validated by experts in Science Education and Measurement and Evaluation. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.91 and 0.86 were obtained for the perception and integration-practice sections, respectively, with an overall coefficient of 0.89. Cohen’s kappa coefficients for the technology-use checklist ranged from 0.76 to 0.92. Data collected were analysed using mean, standard deviations, frequencies, percentages and simple linear regression. Findings showed that teachers had positive perceptions of AI as a useful tool for Basic Science teaching (x̄ = 3.13, SD = 0.75). ChatGPT was the most used AI technology (63%), mainly for information searching (56%), generating lesson ideas (50%), developing instructional materials (47%) and preparing lesson plans (45%). AI integration practices were at the sometimes level (x̄ = 2.65, SD = 1.04). Teachers’ perceptions had a weak positive relationship with integration practices (R = .171) and explained 2.9% of the variance (β = .171, t = 1.166). Thus, positive perceptions alone may not translate into extensive AI integration. Targeted professional development, practical AI competencies, infrastructure and pedagogically purposeful support are needed to strengthen meaningful AI integration in Basic Science teaching. </p>
      </abstract>

            <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
                <kwd>Artificial Intelligence</kwd>
                <kwd>Basic Science</kwd>
                <kwd>AI Integration</kwd>
                <kwd>Teachers’ Perceptions</kwd>
                <kwd>Upper Basic Science</kwd>
                <kwd>Technology Integration.</kwd>
              </kwd-group>
      
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
                <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
              </history>

      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright &copy; 2026 by the authors</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>

    </article-meta>
  </front>

    <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
                      <ref id="ref-1">
          <mixed-citation>Agbidye, A., &amp;amp; Akwaji, N. I. (2026). Effect of Think-Pair-Share learning strategy with audio-visual aids on Basic 8 students’ performance in Basic Science in Ogoja, Cross River State. BSU Journal of Science, Mathematics and Computer Education, 6(1), 53-64.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-2">
          <mixed-citation>Agbidye, A., &amp;amp; Imoko, M. (2025). Effect of self-regulated learning strategy on secondary school students’ acquisition of science process skills in Biology in Makurdi, Benue State. BSU Journal of Education, 25(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.60787/bsuje.vol25no2.47</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-3">
          <mixed-citation>Agbidye, A., Achor, E. E., &amp;amp; Ogbeba, J. (2019). Problem-based learning strategy in Upper Basic Two and Science students’ cognitive load in Makurdi, Nigeria. International Centre for Science, Humanities and Education Research Journal, 4(2), 92–99.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-4">
          <mixed-citation>Agbidye, A., Ayua, G. A., Gamat, G. B., &amp;amp; Ikyernum, G. S. (2023b). Impact of improvised materials on creative-thinking–abstractness of title in Basic Science among secondary school students in Makurdi, Benue State. Zamfara International Journal of Education, 3(4), 151-158.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-5">
          <mixed-citation>Agbidye, A., Tartenger, T. T., &amp;amp; Kpiranyam, F. S. (2025). Effect of critical exploration strategy on students’ academic achievement in Basic Science in Makurdi, Benue State. African Journal of Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 268–276.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-6">
          <mixed-citation>Agbidye, A., Tartenger, T. T., Ayua, G. A., &amp;amp; Akpoughol, T. V. (2023a). Effect of anchored instruction on students’ performance in Basic Science at Upper Basic schools in Makurdi. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 57,</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-7">
          <mixed-citation>Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research. Research in Science Education, 54, 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-8">
          <mixed-citation>Anwam, T., Agajah, M.E., Kpiranyam, F.S., &amp;amp; Fakaa, S.G. (2026). Effects of concept mapping and expository instructional strategies on students’ interest and performance in Basic Science in Benue State, Nigeria. Benue Journal of Research in Science and Science Education, 2(1), 1-11.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-9">
          <mixed-citation>Awofala, A. O. A., Bazza, M. B., Ojo, O. T., Oladipo, A. J., Olabiyi, O. S., &amp;amp; Arigbabu, A. A. (2025). Structural equation modeling of Nigerian science, technology and mathematics teachers’ adoption of educational artificial intelligence tools. Digital Education Review, 46, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2025.46.51-64</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-10">
          <mixed-citation>Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., &amp;amp; Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-11">
          <mixed-citation>Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W. M., Petocz, P., &amp;amp; Alfano, M. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative artificial intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 15403–15439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-12">
          <mixed-citation>Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., &amp;amp; Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66, 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-13">
          <mixed-citation>Cheah, Y. H., Lu, J., &amp;amp; Kim, J. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in K-12 education: Examining teachers’ preparedness, practices, and barriers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100363</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-14">
          <mixed-citation>Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., &amp;amp; Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-15">
          <mixed-citation>David, E. T., Nnaemeka, G. U., Akuneme, C. C., &amp;amp; Nwosu, C. K. (2025). AI in education: A cross-sectional study on teachers’ attitudes towards AI integration and usage in secondary schools. Journal of Theoretical and Empirical Studies in Education, Special Issue.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-16">
          <mixed-citation>Erümit, A. K., &amp;amp; Özdemir Sarıalioğlu, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in science and chemistry education: A systematic review. Discover Education, 4, 178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00622-3</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-17">
          <mixed-citation>Fakaa, G. S., Kpiranyam, F. S., &amp;amp; Ajio, C. E. (2026a). Effect of model-aided inquiry-based learning on academic performance in Basic Science among students with varied reasoning abilities in Benue State, Nigeria. Federal University Gusau Faculty of Education Journal, 3(3), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026569</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-18">
          <mixed-citation>Fakaa, S. G., Kpiranyam, F. S., Ogbilikwe, B. C., &amp;amp; Abah, J. C. (2026a). Blended-hybrid learning model’s effect on senior secondary students’ holistic development and academic performance in Biology in Benue State, Nigeria. BSU Journal of Science, Mathematics and Computer Education, 6(1), 99-113.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-19">
          <mixed-citation>Garofalo, S. G., &amp;amp; Farenga, S. J. (2025). Science teacher perceptions of the state of knowledge and education at the advent of generative artificial intelligence popularity. Science &amp;amp; Education, 34, 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00534-y</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-20">
          <mixed-citation>Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., &amp;amp; Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-21">
          <mixed-citation>Kpiranyam, F. S., Abaver, S. M., Ogor, C. E., &amp;amp; Ode, J. O. (2024a). Science and mathematics teachers’ competency in evaluating students’ affective and psychomotor domains of senior secondary classroom instruction in Benue State. UNIZIK Journal of STM Education, 7(1), 7–18.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-22">
          <mixed-citation>Kpiranyam, F. S., Achor, E. E., &amp;amp; Fakaa, S. G. (2024b). Scaling up emotional intelligence and critical thinking of students in Biology using concept mapping strategies. FNAS Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 5(4), 92–101.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-23">
          <mixed-citation>Kpiranyam, F. S., Agbidye, A., &amp;amp; Ukor, D. D. (2022). Comparative effects of student team achievement division and assertive questioning instructional strategies on Nigerian students’ critical thinking and performance in Biology. Journal of the International Centre for Science, Humanities and Education Research, 5(2), 98–108.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-24">
          <mixed-citation>Kpiranyam, F. S., Agogo, P. O., &amp;amp; Ode, J. O. (2024c). Use of scaffolding-enriched diagnostic assessment techniques and secondary students’ test anxiety in Biology. International Centre for Science, Humanities &amp;amp; Education Research Journal, 5(5), 26-41.</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-25">
          <mixed-citation>Lee, S. J., &amp;amp; Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K-12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100211</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-26">
          <mixed-citation>Liu, X., &amp;amp; Zhong, B. (2024). A systematic review on how educators teach AI in K-12 education. Educational Research Review, 45, 100642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100642</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-27">
          <mixed-citation>Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-28">
          <mixed-citation>Miao, F., &amp;amp; Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. Mouta, A., Pinto-Llorente, A. M., &amp;amp; Torrecilla-Sánchez, E. M. (2024). Uncovering blind spots in education ethics: Insights from a systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34, 1166–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-29">
          <mixed-citation>Park, J., Teo, T. W., Teo, A., Chang, J., Huang, J. S., &amp;amp; Koo, S. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence into science lessons: Teachers’ experiences and views. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00454-3</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-30">
          <mixed-citation>Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., &amp;amp; Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Investigating the moderating effects of social good and confidence on teachers’ intention to prepare school students for artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12250-1</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-31">
          <mixed-citation>Sperling, K., Stenberg, C.-J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., &amp;amp; Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-32">
          <mixed-citation>Taheri, R., Nazemi, N., Pennington, S. E., Clark, J. A., &amp;amp; Dadgostari, F. (2025). Factors influencing educators&#039; AI adoption: A grounded meta-analysis review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100464</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-33">
          <mixed-citation>Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., &amp;amp; Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-34">
          <mixed-citation>Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., &amp;amp; Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                              <ref id="ref-35">
          <mixed-citation>Zhang, P., &amp;amp; Tur, G. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K-12 education. European Journal of Education, 59, e12599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599</mixed-citation>
        </ref>
                  </ref-list>
  </back>
  
</article>
