References

BJAR

British Journal of Advanced Research

BJAR

3153-709X

Ivory and Finch Publishers

10.68263/BJAR-M9X34U82

BJAR_OCT_26_021

Original Research Article

From Readiness to Revenue: Development Pathways, Prospects, Impacts, and Economic Value of Forest Carbon and Blue Carbon Projects in Bangladesh

Biswas

Partho

https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2107-8566

Blue Carbon Specialist, Bangladesh Bondhu Foundation (Bondhu) partho@bondhufoundation.org

10 11 2026

1 5

Bangladesh has completed most REDD+ readiness requirements and drafted a Carbon Market Framework, but lacks an evidence-based pathway for turning forest and coastal ecosystems into high-integrity carbon projects. Using secondary data from national policy instruments, the Forest Reference Level (FRL), the third Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), crediting standards and published literature, this study synthesised a 23-step project development pathway and modelled mitigation potential and economic value under three scenarios. Gross FRL emissions of 1.18 Mt CO2 yr−1 from four forest zones limit REDD+ to 0.29–0.88 Mt CO2 yr−1 of reductions. Restoring the 330,000 ha targeted in the NDC could raise total mitigation to 1.43–4.11 Mt CO2e yr−1 by 2035, with credits worth USD 9–102 million yr−1. Levelised costs were lowest for coastal mangrove afforestation (USD 22 t−1 CO2e) and highest for Hill forest reforestation and REDD+ (about USD 80 t−1), well above current prices. Project development takes four to six years, and land tenure, free, prior and informed consent and benefit-sharing agreements determine the pace. Bangladesh’s comparative advantage lies in removal-based blue carbon and community restoration. Scaling up requires an updated FRL, legally defined carbon rights, registry safeguards against overselling, and blended finance.

REDD+ Blue Carbon Mangrove Afforestation Article 6 Carbon Market Framework Forest Reference Level Nature-Based Solutions Benefit Sharing Levelised Cost Of Carbon Sundarbans

12 10 2026 15 10 2026

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

1.Harris, N.L.; Gibbs, D.A.; Baccini, A.; Birdsey, R.A.; de Bruin, S.; Farina, M.; Fatoyinbo, L.; Hansen, M.C.; Herold, M.; Houghton, R.A.; et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 2021, 11, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00976-6

2.Nabuurs, G.-J.; Mrabet, R.; Abu Hatab, A.; Bustamante, M.; Clark, H.; Havlík, P.; House, J.; Mbow, C.; Ninan, K.N.; Popp, A.; et al. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses (AFOLU). In Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Shukla, P.R., Skea, J., Slade, R., Al Khourdajie, A., van Diemen, R., McCollum, D., Pathak, M., Some, S., Vyas, P., Fradera, R., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 747–860.

3.Griscom, B.W.; Adams, J.; Ellis, P.W.; Houghton, R.A.; Lomax, G.; Miteva, D.A.; Schlesinger, W.H.; Shoch, D.; Siikamäki, J.V.; Smith, P.; et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 11645–11650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114

4.Roe, S.; Streck, C.; Obersteiner, M.; Frank, S.; Griscom, B.; Drouet, L.; Fricko, O.; Gusti, M.; Harris, N.; Hasegawa, T.; et al. Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nat. Clim. Change 2019, 9, 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9

5.Donato, D.C.; Kauffman, J.B.; Murdiyarso, D.; Kurnianto, S.; Stidham, M.; Kanninen, M. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 2011, 4, 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123

6.Kauffman, J.B.; Adame, M.F.; Arifanti, V.B.; Schile-Beers, L.M.; Bernardino, A.F.; Bhomia, R.K.; Donato, D.C.; Feller, I.C.; Ferreira, T.O.; Jesus Garcia, M.D.C.; et al. Total ecosystem carbon stocks of mangroves across broad global environmental and physical gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 2020, 90, e01405. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1405

7.Mcleod, E.; Chmura, G.L.; Bouillon, S.; Salm, R.; Björk, M.; Duarte, C.M.; Lovelock, C.E.; Schlesinger, W.H.; Silliman, B.R. A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9, 552–560. https://doi.org/10.1890/110004

8.Alongi, D.M. Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2014, 6, 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020

9.Macreadie, P.I.; Costa, M.D.P.; Atwood, T.B.; Friess, D.A.; Kelleway, J.J.; Kennedy, H.; Lovelock, C.E.; Serrano, O.; Duarte, C.M. Blue carbon as a natural climate solution. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1

10.Goldberg, L.; Lagomasino, D.; Thomas, N.; Fatoyinbo, T. Global declines in human-driven mangrove loss. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 5844–5855. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15275

11.Friess, D.A.; Howard, J.; Huxham, M.; Macreadie, P.I.; Ross, F. Capitalizing on the global financial interest in blue carbon. PLOS Clim. 2022, 1, e0000061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000061

12.Ecosystem Marketplace. State of the Voluntary Carbon Market 2025: Meeting the Moment; Forest Trends Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2025.

13.West, T.A.P.; Wunder, S.; Sills, E.O.; Börner, J.; Rifai, S.W.; Neidermeier, A.N.; Frey, G.P.; Kontoleon, A. Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science 2023, 381, 873–877. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade3535

14.Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM). Integrity Council Approves Three REDD+ Methodologies. 15 November 2024. Available online: https://icvcm.org/integrity-council-approves-three-redd-methodologies/ (accessed on 16 September 2026).

15.Verra. VM0047 Afforestation, Reforestation, and Revegetation, v1.1; Verra: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. Available online: https://verra.org/methodologies/vm0047-afforestation-reforestation-and-revegetation-v1-1/ (accessed on 16 September 2026).

16.United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Decision 2/CMA.3: Guidance on Cooperative Approaches Referred to in Article 6, Paragraph 2, of the Paris Agreement. In Report of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement on Its Third Session; FCCC/PA/CMA/2021/10/Add.1; UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2022.

17.United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Decision 3/CMA.3: Rules, Modalities and Procedures for the Mechanism Established by Article 6, Paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement. In Report of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement on Its Third Session; FCCC/PA/CMA/2021/10/Add.1; UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2022.

18.Johnstone, I. Article 6 in Focus: Outcomes from COP29. Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford. 19 December 2024. Available online: https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/news/article-6-focus-outcomes-cop29 (accessed on 16 September 2026).

19.Morgan Lewis. COP30: Key Outcomes for Carbon Markets. December 2025. Available online: https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2025/12/cop30-key-outcomes-for-carbon-markets (accessed on 16 September 2026).

20.Carbon Brief. COP30: Key Outcomes for Food, Forests, Land and Nature at the UN Climate Talks in Belém. 2025. Available online: https://www.carbonbrief.org/cop30-key-outcomes-for-food-forests-land-and-nature-at-the-un-climate-talks-in-belem (accessed on 16 September 2026).

21.Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC). Bangladesh’s Third Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC 3.0); Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2025.

22.United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Decisions 9/CP.19 to 15/CP.19 (Warsaw Framework for REDD+). In Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Nineteenth Session; FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1; UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2014.

23.Bangladesh Forest Department (BFD). Bangladesh National REDD+ Strategy (BNRS): 2016–2030; Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2022; ISBN 978-984-34-7228-1.

24.Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC). The Submission of Bangladesh’s Forest Reference Level for REDD+ under the UNFCCC (Modified Submission); Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2019. Available online: https://redd.unfccc.int/files/frl-report_revised_17_july2019_f.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2026).

25.Department of Environment (DoE). Bangladesh Carbon Market Framework, Version 1.0 (Draft); Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2025.

26.The Daily Star. PM Directs Action Plan to Increase Bangladesh’s Carbon Credits. 5 July 2026. Available online: https://www.thedailystar.net/news/governance/news/pm-directs-action-plan-increase-bangladeshs-carbon-credits-4216266 (accessed on 16 September 2026).

27.Dhaka Tribune. Govt Allocates Tk100cr for Climate Trust Fund. 11 June 2026. Available online: https://www.dhakatribune.com/business/412365/govt-allocates-tk100c-for-climate-trust-fund (accessed on 16 September 2026).

28.Carbon Herald. Varaha & SAF Bangladesh Mark the Country’s First Agroforestry Credits Issued under Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard. 18 May 2026. Available online: https://carbonherald.com/varaha-saf-bangladesh-mark-the-countrys-first-agroforestry-credits-issued-under-verras-verified-carbon-standard/ (accessed on 16 September 2026).

29.Rahman, M.H.; Miah, M.D. Are protected forests of Bangladesh prepared for the implementation of REDD+? A forest governance analysis from Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary. Environments 2017, 4, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments4020043

30.Thompson, I.; Jashimuddin, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Khan, S.I. Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Bangladesh; Technical Report; UN-REDD Bangladesh National Programme, Bangladesh Forest Department: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2017.

31.Islam, K.K.; Sato, N. Deforestation, land conversion and illegal logging in Bangladesh: The case of the Sal (Shorea robusta) forests. iForest 2012, 5, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0578-005

32.Rasul, G. Political ecology of the degradation of forest commons in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. Environ. Conserv. 2007, 34, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907003888

33.Hassan, M.M.; Smith, A.C.; Walker, K.; Rahman, M.K.; Southworth, J. Rohingya refugee crisis and forest cover change in Teknaf, Bangladesh. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050689

34.Rahman, M.M.; Khan, M.N.I.; Hoque, A.K.F.; Ahmed, I. Carbon stock in the Sundarbans mangrove forest: Spatial variations in vegetation types and salinity zones. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 23, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-014-9379-x

35.Ahmed, S.; Hossain, M.L.; Roy, S.K.; Li, J.; Salam, M.A. Ecosystem carbon accumulation of Sonneratia apetala mangroves along an afforestation chronology in Bangladesh. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2024, 259, 107466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107466

36.Uddin, M.S.; de Ruyter van Steveninck, E.; Stuip, M.; Shah, M.A.R. Economic valuation of provisioning and cultural services of a protected mangrove ecosystem: A case study on Sundarbans Reserve Forest, Bangladesh. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 5, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.002

37.Akber, M.A.; Patwary, M.M.; Islam, M.A.; Rahman, M.R. Storm protection service of the Sundarbans mangrove forest, Bangladesh. Nat. Hazards 2018, 94, 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3395-8

38.Dasgupta, S.; Islam, M.S.; Huq, M.; Khan, Z.H.; Hasib, M.R. Quantifying the protective capacity of mangroves from storm surges in coastal Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214079

39.Majumdar, M.S.M.; Matsui, K. Understanding the contribution of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) in mangrove forest conservation: A case study on Sundarbans mangrove forest, Bangladesh. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083583

40.Bangladesh Forest Department (BFD). Bangladesh Forest Inventory, 2019 (Microdata). FAO Microdata Catalog. Available online: https://microdata.fao.org/index.php/catalog/2651 (accessed on 16 September 2026).

41.United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Report on the Technical Assessment of the Proposed Forest Reference Level of Bangladesh Submitted in 2019; UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2019. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/tar2019_BGD.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2026).

42.Verra. VM0048 Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, v1.0; Verra: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. Available online: https://verra.org/methodologies/vm0048-reducing-emissions-from-deforestation-and-forest-degradation-v1-0/ (accessed on 16 September 2026).

43.Verra. VM0033 Methodology for Tidal Wetland and Seagrass Restoration, v2.1; Verra: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. Available online: https://verra.org/methodologies/vm0033-methodology-for-tidal-wetland-and-seagrass-restoration-v2-1/ (accessed on 16 September 2026).

44.Architecture for REDD+ Transactions (ART). The REDD+ Environmental Excellence Standard (TREES), Version 2.0; ART Secretariat: Arlington, VA, USA, 2021.

45.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use; Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., Eds.; Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES): Hayama, Japan, 2006.

46.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands; Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Tanabe, K., Srivastava, N., Baasansuren, J., Fukuda, M., Troxler, T.G., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.

47.Golub, A.; Labbate, G.; Cheney, E. Pricing Forest Carbon; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2023.

48.Costello, L.; Sola, G.; Akhter, M.; Aziz, T.; Akhter, H.; Henry, M. Forest Biomass in Bangladesh: An Historical Review of Forest Inventories to Assist National Estimates; Bangladesh Forest Department and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2016.

49.ClearBlue Markets. Gold Standard Releases New Mangrove Methodology. 2024. Available online: https://www.clearbluemarkets.com/knowledge-base/gold-standard-releases-new-mangrove-methodology (accessed on 16 September 2026).

50.Verra. AFOLU Non-Permanence Risk Tool, v4.2; Verra: Washington, DC, USA, 2023.

51.Montenegro, J.F.; Mohan, M.; Ewane, E.B.; et al. Mangrove-based carbon market projects: Current trends and future perspectives. For. Policy Econ. 2025, 181, 103658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103658

52.Pearson, T.R.H.; Brown, S.; Sohngen, B.; Henman, J.; Ohrel, S. Transaction costs for carbon sequestration projects in the tropical forest sector. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 2014, 19, 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9469-8

53.Mollick, A.S.; Rahman, M.K.; Khan, M.N.I.; Sadath, M.N. Evaluation of good governance in a participatory forestry program: A case study in Madhupur Sal forests of Bangladesh. For. Policy Econ. 2018, 95, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.014

54.Dhaka Tribune. Bangladesh Targets 250 Million Trees in Five Years. 9 July 2026. Available online: https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/bangladesh-environment/414665/bangladesh-targets-250-million-trees-in-five-years (accessed on 16 September 2026).

55.Gale, N.K.; Heath, G.; Cameron, E.; Rashid, S.; Redwood, S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2013, 13, 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117

56.Bernal, B.; Murray, L.T.; Pearson, T.R.H. Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities. Carbon Balance Manag. 2018, 13, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0110-8

57.Cook-Patton, S.C.; Leavitt, S.M.; Gibbs, D.; Harris, N.L.; Lister, K.; Anderson-Teixeira, K.J.; Briggs, R.D.; Chazdon, R.L.; Crowther, T.W.; Ellis, P.W.; et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 2020, 585, 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x

58.Fennessy, M.S.; Schile-Beers, L. The Contribution of Blue Carbon Ecosystems to Climate Change Mitigation; Ramsar Briefing Note No. 12; Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands: Gland, Switzerland, 2021.

59.Rennert, K.; Errickson, F.; Prest, B.C.; Rennels, L.; Newell, R.G.; Pizer, W.; Kingdon, C.; Wingenroth, J.; Cooke, R.; Parthum, B.; et al. Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature 2022, 610, 687–692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9

60.Cacho, O.J.; Lipper, L.; Moss, J. Transaction costs of carbon offset projects: A comparative study. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 88, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.008

61.Asian Development Bank (ADB). Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of Projects; ADB: Manila, Philippines, 2017.

62.Zeng, Y.; Friess, D.A.; Sarira, T.V.; Siman, K.; Koh, L.P. Global potential and limits of mangrove blue carbon for climate change mitigation. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, 1737–1743.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.070

63.Chakma, M.; Hayat, U.; Meng, J.; Hassan, M.A. An assessment of landscape and land use/cover change and its implications for sustainable landscape management in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Land 2023, 12, 1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081610

64.Islam, I.; Cui, S.; Hoque, M.Z.; Abdullah, H.M.; Tonny, K.F.; Ahmed, M.; Ferdush, J.; Xu, L.; Ding, S. Dynamics of tree outside forest land cover development and ecosystem carbon storage change in Eastern Coastal Zone, Bangladesh. Land 2022, 11, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010076

65.Zashimuddin, M. Community forestry for poverty reduction in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Forests for Poverty Reduction: Can Community Forestry Make Money?; RAP Publication 2004/04; FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific: Bangkok, Thailand, 2004. Available online: https://www.fao.org/4/ad511e/ad511e0g.htm (accessed on 16 September 2026).

66.LEAF Coalition. Forest Governments. Available online: https://www.leafcoalition.org/forest-governments (accessed on 16 September 2026).

67.UN-REDD Programme. Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed Consent; UN-REDD Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.

68.Iqbal, M.H. Valuing ecosystem services of Sundarbans mangrove forest: Approach of choice experiment. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 24, e01273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01273

69.Salem, M.E.; Mercer, D.E. The economic value of mangroves: A meta-analysis. Sustainability 2012, 4, 359–383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4030359

70.Gijón Mancheño, A.; Herman, P.M.J.; Jonkman, S.N.; Kazi, S.; Urrutia, I.; van Ledden, M. Mapping mangrove opportunities with open access data: A case study for Bangladesh. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158212

71.Shaikh, H. Market-Based Solutions for Sustainable Development: Lessons from the Delta Blue Carbon Project in Pakistan. International Growth Centre. 5 June 2023. Available online: https://www.theigc.org/blogs/climate-priorities-developing-countries/market-based-solutions-sustainable-development (accessed on 16 September 2026).

72.Angelsen, A.; Martius, C.; De Sy, V.; Duchelle, A.E.; Larson, A.M.; Pham, T.T., Eds. Transforming REDD+: Lessons and New Directions; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007045

73.The Daily Star. LDC Graduation Deferral Awaits UNGA Nod. 23 July 2026. Available online: https://www.thedailystar.net/news/bangladesh/news/ldc-graduation-deferral-awaits-unga-nod-4230371 (accessed on 16 September 2026).

74.Rafi, H.I. Can Bangladesh Really Earn $1 Billion a Year through Climate Action? The Business Standard, 20 April 2026. Available online: https://www.tbsnews.net/thoughts/can-bangladesh-really-earn-1-billion-year-through-climate-action-1416066 (accessed on 16 September 2026).

75.Austin, K.G.; Baker, J.S.; Sohngen, B.L.; Wade, C.M.; Daigneault, A.; Ohrel, S.B.; Ragnauth, S.; Bean, A. The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing the world’s forests to mitigate climate change. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19578-z

76.Busch, J.; Engelmann, J.; Cook-Patton, S.C.; Griscom, B.W.; Kroeger, T.; Possingham, H.; Shyamsundar, P. Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide removal through tropical reforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 2019, 9, 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0485-x

77.Schneider, L.; La Hoz Theuer, S. Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement. Clim. Policy 2019, 19, 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1521332

78.Rafi, H.I. The Prime Minister’s Carbon Credit Push Must Build a Community-Led Climate Economy. The Business Standard, 7 July 2026. Available online: https://www.tbsnews.net/thoughts/prime-ministers-carbon-credit-push-must-build-community-led-climate-economy-1482071 (accessed on 16 September 2026).

79.Luttrell, C.; Loft, L.; Gebara, M.F.; Kweka, D.; Brockhaus, M.; Angelsen, A.; Sunderlin, W.D. Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 52. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05834-180452

80.Wunder, S.; Börner, J.; Ezzine-de-Blas, D.; Feder, S.; Pagiola, S. Payments for environmental services: Past performance and pending potentials. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2020, 12, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094206

81.Duchelle, A.E.; Simonet, G.; Sunderlin, W.D.; Wunder, S. What is REDD+ achieving on the ground? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 32, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.07.001

82.Plan Vivo Foundation. Mikoko Pamoja—Kenya. Available online: https://www.planvivo.org/projects/mikoko-pamoja-kenya (accessed on 16 September 2026).

83.Agence Française de Développement (AFD). Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN Bangladesh Launch Major Conservation Initiative for the Sundarbans, with Support from AFD. 17 November 2025. Available online: https://www.afd.fr/en/press-releases/bangladesh-forest-department-and-iucn-bangladesh-launch-major-conservation (accessed on 16 September 2026).