BJAR British Journal of Advanced Research BJAR 3153-709X Ivory and Finch Publishers 10.68263/BJAR-YDWMP4C6 BJAR_AUG_26_043 Original Research Article Corporate Social Responsibility and Digital Activism: A Comparative Study of Organisational Communication Strategies on Meta and X. George Ogazi Mani EZE, https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6765-6123 Department of Mass Communication, Faculty of Humanities, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. george.eze@iaue.edu.ng Esther IHUNDA, https://orcid.org/https:// orcid.org/0009-0000-4993-1162 Department of Mass Communication, Faculty of Humanities, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Christiana AFIESIMAMA, https://orcid.org/https:// orcid.org/0009-0004-6479-6682 Department of Mass Communication, Faculty of Humanities, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Nigeria 10 09 2026 1 3

The swift rise of digital platforms has reshaped how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is communicated and has heightened the impact of digital activism on the reputation and accountability of NNPCL and Dangote Group. This study examined the relationship between CSR and digital activism by comparing the communication strategies of these organisations on Meta and X Corp. Utilising stakeholder theory and dialogic communication theory, the research explores how companies frame their CSR efforts, react to activist pressures, and navigate reputational risks within the unique structures and algorithms of each platform. Through qualitative approach and digital discourse analysis, the study examined select CSR-related posts and activist interactions on both platforms from 2022 to 2025. The results showed notable differences in tone, interactivity, and responsiveness. On Meta-owned platforms, organisations often employed visually engaging storytelling and community-focused narratives that highlighted empathy and inclusivity. Conversely, communication on X was typically more immediate, reactive, and centered on specific issues, mirroring the platform’s fast-paced discursive culture and its vulnerability to viral activism. The study also revealed that digital activism increasingly influenced CSR messaging, pushing organisations to embrace more transparent, dialogic, and participatory communication approaches. However, the features of each platform and their algorithmic frameworks affected the depth of engagement and the sustainability of dialogue. By shedding light on the differing communication patterns across Meta and X, this research adds valuable insights to the growing field of digital public relations, platform governance, and corporate accountability in our interconnected society.

 Corporate Social Responsibility Digital Activism Organisational Communication Platform Governance Stakeholder Engagement 29 08 2026 02 09 2026 Copyright © 2026 by the authors This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. References Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 Capriotti, P., & Moreno, A. (2007). Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.012 Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G Castells, M. (2013). Communication power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.04.004 Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context (3rd ed.). Routledge. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximising business returns to corporate social responsibility: The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x Etter, M. (2014). Broadcasting, reacting, engaging – three strategies for CSR communication in Twitter. Journal of Communication Management, 18(4), 322-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0002 Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing. Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2016). Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #BlackLivesMatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. Center for Media & Social Impact. George, G., & Leidner, D. (2019). From digital transformation to digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 98, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.015 Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press. Highfield, T. (2016). Social media and everyday politics. Polity Press. Ihlen, O., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Wiley-Blackwell. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241-1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952 Kwon, K. H., & Sung, Y. (2011). Follow me! Global marketers’ Twitter use. Public Relations Review, 37(4), 359-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.06.001 Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130 Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77